See the verdict, risk categories, blocker table, and fix order a founder receives before deciding whether to launch, harden first, rescue, or rebuild.
This is a fictional sample report. It is not a testimonial, not a real client result, and not a security certification. Ready? Check… Launch! provides a scoped launch-readiness review. It is not a formal penetration test, legal compliance audit, privacy certification, PCI certification, HIPAA compliance service, or guarantee that the app has no vulnerabilities. Findings are based on the access, materials, and scope provided at the time of review.
Every report should show what was reviewed and what was not received before the verdict is interpreted.
The review used:
None. Redacted/synthetic context only.
Read-only repo or guided screen share after written scope.
The sample report shows the scope boundary first so the verdict is easy to interpret.
Score: 72 / 100 launch risk
Top blockers
The report gives one launch decision and shows how the alternatives differ.
Low visible launch risk in the scoped review. Launch with monitoring, rollback notes, and known residual risks.
The app is close, but P0/P1 blockers should be fixed before real users, private data, payments, or paid traffic arrive.
The product may be salvageable, but critical flows need focused stabilization before launch decisions continue.
Specific unsafe or unstable pieces may need to be rebuilt in a controlled way before launch.
Scores are fictional and shown only to illustrate the report format.
Deploys, env vars, runtime, build path.
16 / 20
Example: Production env differs from preview/local assumptions.
Auth boundaries, RLS, private data.
19 / 20
Example: User-owned records do not have tested RLS policies.
Stripe webhooks, subscriptions, entitlements.
17 / 20
Example: Webhook route accepts events without verified signatures.
AI edits, missing tests, broken flows.
12 / 20
Example: No smoke test covers login → payment/onboarding → dashboard.
Monitoring, logs, rollback, launch day.
8 / 20
Example: No rollback or launch-day incident checklist.
The blocker table separates severity, affected area, business impact, and fix order.
| Severity | Category | Area | Finding | Why it matters | Fix first? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Leak | Supabase RLS | User-owned records do not have tested RLS policies | Tenant/user data could be exposed | Yes |
| Critical | Lose money | Stripe webhooks | Webhook route accepts events without verified signatures | Subscription state could be spoofed or corrupted | Yes |
| High | Break | Vercel/env | Production env differs from preview/local assumptions | App may fail only after launch | Yes |
| High | Regress | Tests/CI | No smoke test covers login → payment/onboarding → dashboard | Future AI edits can break core revenue flow | Yes |
| Medium | Operate blind | Monitoring | No rollback or launch-day incident checklist | Failures may be hard to detect or reverse | After P0/P1 |
The fix order shows what must move first before a hardening sprint is scoped.
Validate environment and secrets handling
Repair/test Supabase RLS and auth boundaries
Verify Stripe webhooks and entitlement source of truth
Add critical-path smoke tests
Add CI gate and launch rollback notes
Recheck before launch
This is the kind of bounded implementation scope that may follow an audit.
Start with private-safe intake, then coordinate least-privilege access only if the audit scope requires it.
Get my launch verdict